Joseph Margoils’s Moral Relativism

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Lecturer in Ethics Philosophy at the Faculty of Arts - New Valley University

Abstract

The research deals with the doctrine of moral relativism of the American philosopher "Margolis", and the most important ideas that he presented in his book "A Life Without Principles" in 1966. The main idea in this book is that there are no permanent fixed principles in the field of ethics, and that morality and human nature are all related to history and civilization. . The topic was addressed through the following pionts:
1- Ethics for Margolis.
2- Margolis ethics and politics.
3- Relativistic ideas in the philosophy of "Margolis" from a critical
    point of view.
4- Applied ethics from the point of view of "Margolis" and his critics.
5- Dr. Al-Alusi, and Prof. Dr. Zakaria Ibrahim in moral relativism.
The results of the research were obtained using the analytical method, which can be summarized in:
1) That "Margolis" applied his moral relativism doctrine in the field of applied ethics and presented ideas that could be accepted.
2) That Margolis' ideas in the philosophy of ethics are likely the result of his merging of ethics and politics, something that has its roots in ancient Greek philosophy.
3) That the topic of relativism and the continuous change in the ethical system, which Margolis emphasized, relates to the rules of behavior that apply the fixed principles, and that the element of relativism and change that Margolis insists on in the field of ethics is mainly related to our awareness of the values ​​represented by these fixed principles.

Keywords

References

(1)  Margoils ,Joseph,Life without Principles: Reconciling Theory and
     Practice, Blacjwell,1996,p.1,p.5                                            
(2) Ibid,p.7,p.9.                   
(3)  Opt.cit,p.15,p.172:173
(4)  Margoils ,Joseph,Life without Principles,p.205,p.206.
(5)  Ibid,p.214:215.
(6)  Opt.cit,p.218:219.
(7)  Margolis,Joseph,Some Famous Ghosts in Ethical Theory,The Journal of  Philosophy ,Vol.51,No.19 (Sep 16),Journal of philosophy ,1954,p.558.
(8)  Margolis,Joseph,On Value theory, By way of the common place,
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,Vol.17.No.4(Jun.,) ,
    International Phenomenological Society,1957,p.515.
(9)  Margolis,Joseph,Moral Appreciation, The Journal of philosophy,Vol.59,
    No.13(Jun.21,)Journal of Philosophy,1962,p.351,p.355
(10) Margolis,Joseph,Moral Utterances and Imperatives, The Journal of
    philosophy,Vol.62,  No.19(Oct.7,)Journal of Philosophy,1965,p.525.
(11)  Margolis,Joseph,The Reasonable of Relativism, Philosophy and      
     Phenomenological Research, Vol.43.No.1(Sep) , International
      Phenomenological Society,1982,p.91,p.96:97.
(12)  Margolis,Joseph,Human Acts and Moral Judgments, Ethics,Vol.80,No.1
    (Oct.),The University of Chicago Press,1969,p.61.
(13)  Margolis,Joseph,Egoism and The confirmation of metamoral theories,
    American Philosophical Quarterly,Vol.7,No.3(Jul.),University of Illinois
    Press on behalf of The North American Philosophical Puplications,
  1970,P.266.
(14) Margolis,Joseph,G.E Moore and Intuitionism,Ethics,Vol.87,No.1(Oct.),
     The University of Chicago press,1976,p.47.
(15) Margolis,Joseph,Religion and Reason, Religious Studies,Vol.12,No.4
    (Dec.,),Cambridge University Press,1976,p.442.
(16)  Margolis,Joseph,The Concepts of Ware and Peace,Social Theory and
      Practice,V0l.6,No.2(Summer),Florida State University Department of
       Philosophy,1980,P.223:224.
(17) Margolis,Joseph,The Nature and Strategies of Relativesism,Mind,New
      Series,Vil.92,No.368(Oct.,) Oxford University ,Press on Behalf of The
      Mind Association,1983,P.548,P.566
(18) Margolis,Joseph,Terroism and The New Forms of War,Metaphilosophy,
   No.3,Special Issu:The Philosophical Challenge of September 11
   (April),Wiley,2004,P.413.
(19) Margolis,Joseph,Replies: Ethics,Metaphysic,Epistomology,Meta
    philosophy ,Vol.36,No.5(Oct.),Wiley,2005,p.630,p.632
(20) Margolis,Joseph,The Trouble with Terror, Metaphilosophy,Vol.38,No.5
    (Oct),Eiley,2007,p.551,p.574.
(21)  Hill,John,Moral Cognitivism, More Unlikely Analogues,Ethics,Vol.86,
  No.3(Apr),The University of Chicago Press,1976,p.255.
(22)  Hannaford,Robert V.,Justifing Moral Commitments, Ethics,Vol.79,
      No.4(Jul),The University of Chicago press,1969,p.265,p.273.
(23)  Boorse,Christopher,On The distinction between disease and illness,
      Philosophy &Public Affairs, Vol.5.No.1(Aut),Wiley,1975,p.54.
(24)  Margolis,Joseph,Negativities:The Limits of Life,Columbus,Ohio,
     1975,p.34.
(25)  Nielsen,H.A,Margolison Rational Suicide:An Argument for Case
      Studies in Ethics,Ethics,Vol.89,No.4(Jul),The University of Chicago
      Press,1979,p.394-395.
(26) Margolis,Joseph,Persons and Minds, D. REIDEL PUBLISHING
     COMPANY,1978,P.101:103.
(27)  Eckardt,Babara,Margolis on Persons and mind Non reductive
     materialism,Philosophy,Vol.12,No.2 (April),Wiley,1981,P.179:180.
(28)  Miller,Arthur,R,Moral Essentialism, and Logical Possibility,
      Metaphilosophy ,Vol.16,No.213(April,July),Wiley,1985,p.149.
(29)  Jr,William Max Knorpp,What Relativism Isn’t ,Philosophy,Vol.73,
      No.384(Apr),Cambridge University Press on Behalf of Royal Institute
     of philosophy,1998,p.300.
(31) Margoils ,Joseph,Life without Principles,p.216.
(32)  Jacquete,Dale,,Margolis on History and Nature,Metaphilosophy,
     Vol.36,No.5(October),Wiley,2005,p.568.
(33)  Davis,Michael and William S.Sneed,Conflict of Interest (With
      Commentry),Business&Professional Ethics Journal,Vol.1,No.4
     (summer),Philosophy Documentation Venter,1982,P.17.
(34)  Luebke,Neil R.,Conflict of interest as moral Category,Business &
     Professional Ethics Journal,Vol.6,No.1(Spring),Philosophy
     Documentation center,1987,P.72:73.
(35)  Margolis,Joseph,Ethics,Metaphysics,Epistemology,Metaphilosophy ,
     Vol.3,No.5,(October),Wiley,2005,P.613.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics