A Diagnostic study of the obstacles to the use of real evaluation methods in the evaluation of university student performance the perspective of faculty members and students and the most important solutions

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor of Educational Psychology - College of Humanities - Al-Azhar University

Abstract

The study aimed at uncovering obstacles to the use of real in the evaluation of the performance of university students from the point of view of faculty members and students. The disability diagnosis scale was applied to a sample of 944 members of the Faculty of Education, of whom 796 were distributed among 304 males, 492 females and 184 members. The faculty consists of 82 male and 66 female faculty members. After conducting the appropriate statistical analysis, many results were achieved, including: the existence of obstacles that prevent the effective use of the real assessment in the evaluation of the university student, including obstacles related to students and system constraints Of the educational process and obstacles to faculty members
There is a difference between the views of all members of the faculty and students towards the obstacles of using the real calendar, in all dimensions of the scale with different paragraphs.
    There was a difference in the level of 0.05 in the responses of the study sample of the students about the obstacles of using real evaluation methods according to the variable of the department. In the end, the study reached a set of solutions to overcome the obstacles that prevent the use of real assessment methods from the perspective of both faculty members and students .                     
 

References

  1.  

    1. Abd Azis K., Amir A., Darman M., Muhammad Y.(2018) The Effectivity of Authentic Assessment Based Character Education Evaluation Model . TEM Journal . 7 ( 3 ). 495 -510.
    2. B. Adeyemi, (2015). The Efficacy of Authentic Assessment and Portfolio Assessment in the Learning of Social Studies in Junior Secondary Schools in Osun State, Nigeria. Ife Psychologia, Ife Centre for Psychological Studies: Nigeria, 23(2), 125-132.
    3. Christopher DeLucaa and Don A. Klinger(2010).,Assessment literacy development: identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice Vol. 17, No. 4, pp:, 419–438.
    4. Chung, H ,Behan, K. (2010). Peer Sharing Facilitates the Effect of Inquiry-based Projects on Science Learning. American Biology Teacher;, 72 (1). p24-29.

     

    1. Doyle,Terry(2011).Leamer Centered Teaching :putting The Research on Learning into practice Stylus  publishing, LLC.(Ed525973).
    2. Drinna J. micael , O' Dwyer P. Tdhg, ridha Hayder And Carding Paul.(2006) the Efectivness Of Avoice Treatment Apprpach For Teachers With Self-Report Voice Problems, The Journal Of Voice.20(3). 423-431.
    3. Galceran Marta, Petruccelli Joseph, Hatzopoulos Stavors.(2007) Vocal Problems Among Teachers:Evaluation Of A Preventive Voice Program, The Journal Of Voice.21(6). 705-722.
    4. Gerard van de Watering , David Gijbels , FilipDochy , &Janine van der Rijt (2008) Students’ assessment preferences, perceptions of assessment and their relationships to study results, High Educ 56.645–658.
    5. Hamayan,E.V(2007)Approaches to allernative assessment.Annual Review of Applid Linguistics,
    6. Hicks, T. ; Lewis, L. ; Munn, G. ; Jordon, E. ; Charles, K.(2010). An Assessment of Teacher Education Students' Perceptions and Satisfaction of Their Learning Experiences in a Summer Pilot Program, College Quarterly, 13 (1) 19.
    7. Hughes, G., (2011),Top of FormTowards a Personal Best: A Case for Introducing Ipsative Assessment in Higher Education, Studies in Higher Education, 36 (3) .353-367.
    8. Jacqueline P. Leighton, Rebecca J. Gokiert, M. Ken Cor and Colleen  Heffernan,(2010). Teacher beliefs about the cognitive diagnostic information of classroom- versus large-scale tests: implications for assessment literacy, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 17( 1) . 7–21.
    9. James Badger,(2011). Assessing reflective thinking: pre-service teachers’ and professors’ perceptions of an oral examination,  Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 17(1). 77–89.
    10. Ketterlin-Geller, L,,YovanofF, P., & Tindal, G. (2009). Developing a new paradigm for conducting research on accommodations in mathematics testing. Exceptional Children, 73,331-347.

     

    1. Linda, D., Hammond, N. &  Ruth, c..(2010).Evaluating teacher education outcomes: a study of the Stanford Teacher Education Programme. Journal of Education for Teaching. 36 ( 4) .369–388.
    2. Mecieire ,J (2000).The Relationship Of Attitude Of Superintendents , Principals,And Social Studies Teacher Of The Utilization Of Closed Circuit Television In The Senior Public High Schools Of South Carolina" Dissertion Abstracts International .Edited By Patrica Colling .Xerox University Microfilms ,Inc, .Ann Arbor , Michiga.
    3. Meiju K., , Jani U., Kari N. (2018). How to measure students’ innovation compete/nces in higher education:Evaluation of an assessment tool in authentic learning environments, Studies in Educational Evaluation 58.30-36.
    4. Michael E. , Charles H. (2010). The Effects of Grading and Teaching Practices on Students’ Perceptions of Grading Fairness, COLLEGE TEACHING,.58. 93–98.
    5. Michelle A. Drouin(2010). Group-Based Formative Summative  Assessment Relates to Improved Student Performance and Satisfaction. Teaching of Psychology, 37. 114–118.
    6. Ocak, Gurbuz ; Yildiz, SureyyaSevki (2011).Top of Form The Evaluation of the Applicability of the  Social Studies Curriculum in Multigrade Teaching in Terms of Teacher Views (A Qualitative Research), Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11 (2). 873-879.
    7. Po-Sheng C., Ying-Hung P., Chih-Chien K., Ting-Ting W. & Yueh- Min H. (2018) An authentic learning based evaluation method for mobile learning in Higher Education, Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 55. (3) .336–347.
    8. Ross, G.S" Weller, L-D. and Brown, c.L. (2002) : '" Att itudes of Georgia public school teachers toward teaching as profession '"perceptual and Motor Skills, PP. 780 -782.
    9. Sasmaz Oren, Fatma ; Ormanci, Ummuhan ; Evrekli, Ertug (2011).The Science and Technology Pre-Service Teachers' Self-Efficacy Levels and Opinions about Alternative Assessment and Evaluation Approaches, Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11 (3) . 1690-1698.

     

    1. Scherz, Z. ; Bialer, L. ; Eylon, &Bat-Sheva (2011).Top of FormTowards Accomplished Practice in Learning Skills for Science (LSS): The Synergy between Design and Evaluation Methodology in a Reflective CPD Programme, Research in Science & Technological Education, 29 (1) .49-69
    2. Tang, J. ; Harrison, C. (2011).Investigating University Tutor Perceptions of Assessment Feedback: Three Types of Tutor Beliefs, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36 (5).583-604.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics