فعالية الإرشاد بالتدخلات الإيجابية المعتمد على القوى الشخصية في خفض التنمر الإلکتروني لدى الطالبات المتنمرات إلکترونياً بالمرحلة الإعدادية

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Lecturer in the Department of Mental Health at the Faculty of Education - Minya University

Abstract

 
The purpose of this study was to reduce Cyber-bullying of cyber-aggression girls students in preparatory stage between the ages of 14 and 15, The sample consisted of a pilot sample, The pilot study sample was selected from Elminia preparatory School, the sample was(254) girls students, The main sample of the research consisted of (7) students at the same town, The Study tools were asked to respond to questionnaires measuring Cyber-bullying, used  11-session strength-based positive psychology intervention, Results indicated that There are statistically significant differences between the scores ranks of counseling group in pre and post-test of Cyber-bullying scale in favor of the  post-test and There are no statistically significant differences between scores ranks means in the post and follow – up measurement after two months on the Cyber-bullying scale.
 
 

Keywords


 
1-    Baek, J., & Bullock, L. M. (2014). Cyberbullying: A cross-cultural perspective. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 19(2), 226–238.
2-    Barbara A. S, Carmel M. T, Anthony L. D, Alexander S, Larisa T. K (2015).Cyberbullying, help-seeking and mental health in young Australians: implications for public health.International Journal of Public Health, 60(2), 219-226.
3-    Baker E Ö & Kavsut F. (2007). A new face of peer bullying: cyberbullying. Journal of Euroasian Educational Research. 27,31–42.
4-    Berne, S., Frisén, A., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Naruskov, K., Luik, P., et al. (2013). Cyberbullying assessment instruments: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 320–334.
5-    Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estévez, A., Villardَn, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying inadolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1128–1135.