A proposed vision for managing Egyptian university education in light of the indicators of the Fifth Industrial Revolution

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 أستاذ أصول التربية ووكيل الكلية لشؤون خدمة المجتمع وتنمية البيئة بكلية التربية جامعة المنوفية

2 مدرس التربية المقارنة والإدارة التعليمية بكلية التربية جامعة المنوفية

Abstract

The aim of the current research is to present a proposed vision for the management of Egyptian university education in light of the indicators of the Fifth Industrial Revolution by identifying the problems and challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the theoretical foundations of the Fifth Industrial Revolution, its advantages and indicators, and identifying the reality of university education management in Egypt in light of the indicators of the Fifth Industrial Revolution. The research attempts to develop a proposed vision for managing university education in Egypt in light of the indicators of the Fifth Industrial Revolution.
     The research relied on descriptive method procedures. The questionnaire was used to identify the reality of Egyptian university education management in light of the indicators of the Fifth Industrial Revolution, and to present a proposed vision for its development, to confront the effects and challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The research community represents all university education experts from Egyptian university professors specializing in (principles of education/comparative education and educational administration). - Educational psychology and mental health - curricula, teaching methods and educational technology) in Egypt; The application was carried out on a purposefully selected sample of one hundred educational experts, and the research reached a set of results, the most important of which are the following:
- The degree of verification of the reality of university education management in light of the indicators of the Fifth Industrial Revolution, from the point of view of some educational experts, was average for the questionnaire as a whole, as well as for the ten axes, as is evident from the general weighted mean (3.36) and the standard deviation (0.82). ), and the percentage (67.21%), and this needs to be developed for the questionnaire as a whole, as well as for the sub-dimensions of the questionnaire, where the level of reality is average for 6 dimensions and above average for 4 dimensions.
- The first dimension, related to “the vision and mission of university education,” came in first place in the ranking of the axes and in terms of the degree of verification, which is a large degree of verification, with an arithmetic mean (3.71) and a standard deviation (0.81).
- The seventh dimension, related to “teaching methods and strategies,” came in last place in the ranking of the axes and in terms of the degree of verification, which is an average degree of verification, with an arithmetic mean (3.09) and a standard deviation (1.04).
- Developing a proposed vision for the management of Egyptian university education in light of the indicators of the Fifth Industrial Revolution.

Keywords


  • Akkaya, B and Ahmed, J. (2022). VUCA-RR Toward Industry 5.0. Agile Management and VUCA-RR: Opportunities and Threats in Industry 4.0 towards Society 5.0. Chapter 1. Emerald Publishing Limited. 1–11. Available at: doi:10.1108/978-1-80262-325-320220001.
  • Baig, Hassan.(2022, March, 28). The fifth revolution. Retrieved from: The fifth revolution (thenews.com.pk) at 24/11/2022, at 01:39 PM.
  • Benesova A., Tupa J. (2017, June 27-30). Requirements for Education and Qualification of People in Industry 4.0 [Poster presentation]. 27th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing. Modena. Italy. 2195-2202.
  • Bottani, N. & Walberg H. J. (1999). International educational indictors, overview, in husen, torsten & T.Nevile postlehwaite (eds.). the international Encyclopedia of Education. 2nd, Vol.5, Pergamum. New york.
  • Breque, M., De Nul, L., & Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0: Towards a sustainable, humancentric and resilient European industry. Luxembourg: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
  • Broo, D, D, Kaynak, O, Sait S, M.(2022). Rethinking engineering education at the age of industry 5.0. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. (25) 100311.
  • Chassignola, M, et, al.(2018). Artificial Intelligence trends in education: a narrative overview, 7th International Young Scientist Conference on Computational Science, Toulon, France, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia , Saint Petersburg, Russia.
  • Costa,C, M & Galán, E, M, and Leandro, F, J.(2022). Does Fifth Industrial Revolution Benefit or Trouble the Global Civil Society? Contestations in Global Civil Society. Emerald Publishing Limited. Chapter 4.45–62. Rertieved from: doi:10.1108/978-1-80043-700-520221006.
  • Davies J. (2016, Oct). Program good ethics into artificial intelligence. Nature research journal.;538(7625). doi: 10.1038/538291a. PMID: 27762389, retrieved from: https://www.nature.com/articles/538291a, at14/8/2021 at 12:08PM.
  • Derek O'Halloran,Nicholas Davis, The Fourth Industrial Revolution Is Driving Globalization 4.0, World Economic Forum, 08 Nov 2018 https://goo.gl/NLMQQX, visited 25/11/2018
  • Eguchi, A. (2014). Educational Robotics for Promoting 21st Century Skills. Journal of Automation. Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems. 8(1), 5-11.