The study aimed to identify the practice of servant leadership of school principals in Kuwait from their teachers’ perspectives and its relation to their job satisfaction. The current study followed the descriptive approach. The tool of this study is the Organizational Leadership Assessment (OLA) which consisted of (41) items. The study sample included (794) teachers in public schools in Kuwait. The study results are as following:
- Teachers’ perspectives toward servant leadership practiced is in moderate levels. Based on six categories of servant leadership, building community ranked first, followed by providing leadership, valuing others, developing people, displaying authenticity, and shares leadership.
- Teachers expressed a high level of job satisfaction.
- A statistically significant positive correlation was found between school principal servant leadership practices from teachers’ perspectives and teachers’ job satisfaction.
- No differences were found in teachers’ perspectives toward school principals servant leadership due to their years of experiences.
Alsaleh, A. (2018). Investigating instructional leadership in Kuwait’s educational reform context: school leaders’ perspectives. School Leadership and Management, pp. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1467888
Baptiste, M. (2019). No Teacher Left Behind: The Impact of Principal Leadership Styles on Teacher Job Satisfaction and Student Success. Journal of International Education and Leadership, 9(1), 1–11.
Betz, N. C. (2012). Tides of school reform: A case for servant leadership. (Doctorate dissertation, College of Saint Elizabeth Morristown, New Jersey). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2012. 3507601.
Black, G. L. (2010). Correlational Analysis of Servant Leadership and School Climate. Journal of Catholic Education, 13(4), 437–466. https://doi.org/10.15365/joce.1304032013
Bolger, R. (2001). The Influence of Leadership Style on Teacher Job Satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 662–682. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n9p172
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001
Chambliss, A. (2013). The relationship between job satisfaction of teachers and the level of servant leadership of their campus administrators. Lamar University-Beaumont.
Cerit, Y. (2009). The effects of servant leadership behaviours of school principals on teachers’ job satisfaction. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 37(5), 600–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143209339650
Crabtree, C. T. S. (2014). The Relationship Between Servant Leadership and Student Achievement in Southwest Virginia Schools. Liberty University.
Crippen, C. (2007). Servant-Leadership as an Effective Model for Educational Leadership and Management: Management in Education, 18(5), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/089202060501800503
Greenleaf, R.K. (1977), Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness, Paulist Press, New York, NY
Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of education, 33(3), 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122005
Ibrahim, I. B., & Don, Y. B. (2014). Servant leadership and effective changes management in schools. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(1), 1-9.
Johnson, S. M., Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2011). How Context Matters in High-Need Schools. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1–39.
Michaelowa, K. (2002). Teacher job satisfaction, student achievement, and the cost of primary education in Francophone Sub-Saharan Africa (No. 188). HWWA Discussion Paper. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/19349/1/188.pdf
Laub, J. (1999). Assessing the Servant Organization Development of the Servant Organizational Leadership Assessment (SOLA) Instrument. Retrieved from https://olagroup.com/Images/mmDocument/Laub%20Dissertation%20Complete%2099.pdf
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800060
Muijs, D. (2010). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Olsen, A., & Huang, F. (2019). Teacher job satisfaction by principal support and teacher cooperation: Results from the Schools and Staffing Survey. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(11), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.4174
Parris, D., & Peachey, J. (2013). A Systematic Literature Review of Servant Leadership Theory in Organizational Contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(3), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551
Rahayani, Y. (2010). Servant Leadership: Educational Institution. JEE, Journal of English and Education, 4(1), 91-101.
Salameh, K. M. (2011). Servant leadership practices among school principals in educational directorates in Jordan. International Journal Of Business & Social Science, 2(22), 138–145.
Shaw, J., & Newton, J. (2014). Teacher retention and satisfaction with a servant leader as principal. Education, 135(1), 101-106.
Shepherd, M. (2018). Teacher Perceptions of School Culture and Servant Leadership: A Correlation Study (Doctoral dissertation, Texas Wesleyan University).
Smith, B. N., Montagno, R. V., & Kuzmenko, T. N. (2004). Transformational and Servant Leadership: Content and Contextual Comparisons. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(4), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190401000406
Spears, L. C. (2010). Character and Servant Leadership: Ten Characteristics of Effective, Caring Leaders. The Journal of Virtues & Leadership, 1(1), 25–30.
Stone, A. G., Robert, R., & Patterson, K. (2004). Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in leader focus. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410538671
Von Fischer, P., & De Jong, D. (2017). The relationship between teacher perception of principal servant leadership behavior and teacher job satisfaction. Servant Leadership: Theory & Practice, 4(2), 53-84
Weiss, H. M. (2002). Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs and affective experiences. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 173-194.
Woodruff, T. R. (2004). Executive pastors' perception of leadership and management competencies needed for local church administration (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary). Retrieved from http://www.xpastor.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/woodruff_competencies_needed.pdf
Zembylas, M., & Papanastasiou, E. (2004). Job satisfaction among school teachers in Cyprus. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(3), 357-374.
Zhang, Y., Lin, T. Bin, & Foo, S. F. (2012). Servant leadership: A preferred style of school leadership in Singapore. Chinese Management Studies, 6(2), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506141211236794
Alsaleh, A. A. (2020). Servant Leadership for school principals as perceived by teachers in public schools in Kuwait and its relation to their job satisfaction. Faculty of Education Journal Alexandria University, 30(4), 65-90. doi: 10.21608/jealex.2020.152681
MLA
Amal Abdulwahab Alsaleh. "Servant Leadership for school principals as perceived by teachers in public schools in Kuwait and its relation to their job satisfaction", Faculty of Education Journal Alexandria University, 30, 4, 2020, 65-90. doi: 10.21608/jealex.2020.152681
HARVARD
Alsaleh, A. A. (2020). 'Servant Leadership for school principals as perceived by teachers in public schools in Kuwait and its relation to their job satisfaction', Faculty of Education Journal Alexandria University, 30(4), pp. 65-90. doi: 10.21608/jealex.2020.152681
VANCOUVER
Alsaleh, A. A. Servant Leadership for school principals as perceived by teachers in public schools in Kuwait and its relation to their job satisfaction. Faculty of Education Journal Alexandria University, 2020; 30(4): 65-90. doi: 10.21608/jealex.2020.152681